🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming small “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a kind nature.

Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have become pawns in a disagreement between a defunct facility, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their destiny often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the federal government blocked the sale of the belugas to China, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are housed warned to end their lives unless the authorities covers the expense of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has refused that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain situation.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Experts say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, problem solving and group interactions point to they are highly cognitive animals – something one caretaker discovered first-hand.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a position that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so surprised by the details and quirks in their personalities. She cultivated a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve accepted me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Each changed the way I view bonding.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Her relationship with the whales developed against a context of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.

During her time at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, died. In total, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the park ascribes to expected lifespan, but which advocates say points to the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly effects of the closure. “Concrete is breaking off from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and move about with fragments in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not respond to a request for comment, but in the past claimed: “The whales … obtain far higher quality medical attention and constant care than any human in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was dismissed from the facility in early March following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the facility believed details of the incident were disclosed to the news outlets and she was fired not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left her and staff members in despair. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any plans to put down even a individual beluga would require “significant staff”, equipment and specialized tools.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for demands for the whales to be removed right away from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister rejected a bid to send the whales to China.

“Allowing the application would have meant a perpetual situation in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the minister wrote. “As society, we know that whales are meant for the wild, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience approve an export that would continue the treatment these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments reveal a more general incorrect perception of the circumstances of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The people needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As officials work to find a solution, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a important part of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A proposed sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has shown to be contentious. The future facility, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain positive that it could in time represent a sustainable answer for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ future.

Some experts say the prospect of a sanctuary reflects a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a workable plan in the near future.

The project lead, director of the initiative, said the site will replicate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|